Details

Reinventing American Jurisprudence


Reinventing American Jurisprudence

Law through the Lens of Value

von: George David Miller, Laura Brown

CHF 45.00

Verlag: Lexington Books
Format: EPUB
Veröffentl.: 05.11.2021
ISBN/EAN: 9781793639417
Sprache: englisch
Anzahl Seiten: 316

DRM-geschütztes eBook, Sie benötigen z.B. Adobe Digital Editions und eine Adobe ID zum Lesen.

Beschreibungen

<p><span>In </span><span>Reinventing American Jurisprudence: Law through the Lens of Value</span><span>, George David Miller and Laura Brown unfurl an original approach to value and an imaginative landscape in philosophy of law. Value essentialism identifies value formations such as a sacred cow and scapegoat tandem and the intensification of “oughtness” as it approaches sacred zenith values. Readers learn how Occam’s razor has been responsible for the death of many ideas; how the celebrated Other gains nuance as near and remote; and where a spectral assessment of probability and necessity leads. Analyses of Supreme Court cases grow out in different and exciting directions. </span><span>Buck </span><span>was not about eugenics, but another iteration of the value of efficiency and Yo Wick was decided less on law and more on a justice’s finding humanity in Chinese laundry mat proprietors. </span><span>Lochner </span><span>involved not an ideological binary but three distinct value schemes. “Separate but equal” was refined as parallelism and exploitative tangents. In </span><span>Brown</span><span>, the Fourteenth Amendment took a significant subjective turn. In </span><span>Heller</span><span>, the communitarian position of stopping violence before it began could be contrasted with the individualistic position of waiting until you see the whites of their eyes in your bedroom. </span><span>Citizens United</span><span> was distilled into the question: was the First Amendment designed to maximize participation or maximize democracy? </span></p>
<p><span>Using value analysis, the authors uncover the undercurrents of famous United States Supreme Court rulings. Value inquiry reveals surprising and alarming agendas while opening up a fertile ground for debate, scholarship, and an assessment of the values at the heart of a country.</span></p>
<p><span>Part I: Introduction to a New Theory of Law</span></p>
<p><span>Chapter 1: The Primacy of Value</span></p>
<p><span>Chapter 2: Law Theories through the Lens of Value</span></p>
<p><span>Part II: Supreme Court Cases</span></p>
<p><span>Chapter 3: Self-Determination v. Efficiency, Buck v. Bell</span></p>
<p><span>Chapter 4: Human Being v. Degraded Being, Yo Wick v. Hopkins</span></p>
<p><span>Chapter 5: Security of Free Speech v. Wartime National Security, Abrams v. United States</span></p>
<p><span>Chapter 6: Partial Personhood v. Property, Dred Scott v. Sandford</span></p>
<p><span>Chapter 7: Integration as a Means of Securing Personal Liberty for All v. Segregation as a Means</span></p>
<p><span>of Securing White Supremacy and Limiting Personal Freedom, Plessy v. Ferguson</span></p>
<p><span>Chapter 8: Liberty Over Paternalism v. Judicious State Intervention Over Exploitative Liberty,</span></p>
<p><span>Lochner v. New York</span></p>
<p><span>Chapter 9: The Value of Interdependence v. Value of a Private and Independent Economic</span></p>
<p><span>Sphere, Wickard v. Filburn</span></p>
<p><span>Chapter 10: The Sacred Value of Privacy in Marriage v. Traditionalism, Griswold v. Connecticut</span></p>
<p><span>Chapter 11: Malicious Free Speech v. Libel of a Government Official, New York Times Co. v.</span></p>
<p><span>Sullivan</span></p>
<p><span>Chapter 12: The Subjective Turn of the Fourteenth Amendment vs. Separate but Equal, Brown v.</span></p>
<p><span>Board of Education of Topeka</span></p>
<p><span>Chapter 13: Collective Safety Net v. Individualistic Self-Defense, District of Columbia v. Heller</span></p>
<p><span>Chapter 14: The Absolute Value of the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment v. Value of</span></p>
<p><span>Spiritual Heritage, Engel v. Vitale</span></p>
<p><span>Chapter 15: The Value of Privacy in the Bedroom vs. the Value of Social Stability, Lawrence v.</span></p>
<p><span>Texas</span></p>
<p><span>Chapter 16: Weaponized Words v. Fruition of Conscience in Action, Brandenburg v. Ohio</span></p>
<p><span>Chapter 17: Invidious Discrimination v. the Purity of White Supremacy, Loving v. Virginia</span></p>
<p><span>Chapter 18: Health v. Liberty, National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius</span></p>
<p><span>Chapter 19: Venerated Objects v. Freedom of Speech, Texas v. Johnson</span></p>
<p><span>Chapter 20: Functional Judiciary v. National Security, United States v. Nixon</span></p>
<p><span>Chapter 21: The First Amendment as a Means to Secure Corporate Dominance v. First</span></p>
<p><span>Amendment as a Means to Secure Democracy, Citizens United v. Federal Election</span></p>
<p><span>Commission</span></p>
<p><span>Conclusion: One Hundred Eleven Mic Drop Takeaways, Conversation Starters &amp; Stuff That Can</span></p>
<p><span>Startle the Stymied into Writing Creatively</span></p>
<p><span>George David Miller</span><span> is retired philosophy professor and president of Before I Read This Poem, a platform from which he has delivered thousands of writing workshops and performance poetry shows over the past three decades.</span></p>